On 10/12/12 11:43 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
Which concludes that - [1] yes a context pointer is included in the union layout, but [2] its value is never anything meaningful because it is still a field in a union.
Definitely a bug.
I'd say this is a accepts invalid bug - unions should be POD only in my opinion.
Agree, although by the TAWD principle things should just work. Andrei _______________________________________________ dmd-internals mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals
