2013/6/2 Walter Bright <[email protected]> > > On 6/1/2013 2:49 PM, Kenji Hara wrote: > > 2013/6/2 Walter Bright <[email protected]> > >> 1. We already have a 2.063.1 released. An update would be 2.063.2. >> > > ? Sorry, I might have some misunderstanding. > Currently we can access the "2.063" release package from here. > > http://dlang.org/download.html > > http://downloads.dlang.org.s3-website-us-east-1.amazonaws.com/releases/2013/dmd.2.063.zip > > Is this internally called by the name "2.063.1"? > > Yes, and it is so tagged in github. > > We already have v2.063 tag in git repository, so I've thought that > 2.063 is different from 2.063.1. Is that incorrect? > > The v2.063 was an aborted 'release'. 2.063.1 is what was released. (The > compiler & libraries are unchanged, what happened was the documentation was > fixed.) >
OK. I restored v2.063.1 tags to each repos. 2. I'd prefer to wait a bit to collect any more regressions before rushing >> out with an update. >> > > OK. Waiting next "fix-up" release a while seems reasonable. In my > opinion, one or two weeks would be good. But a month is a bit long to me. > > I agree. > Thanks. Kenji Hara
_______________________________________________ dmd-internals mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals
