Jacob Carlborg, el 15 de November a las 18:02 me escribiste: > On 15 nov 2013, at 15:17, Leandro Lucarella <[email protected]> wrote: > > > This is awersome! > > > > What do you think about rebasing instead? I always hated GitHub for > > using merge, and specially for using --no-ff option, it makes the > > history unreadable as a graph (duplicating basically each bugfix > > commit). > > > > The auth issues are the same though, except for the fact that if you > > don't rebase as the user that triggered the "merge", there is no way to > > say somebody else did it. But honestly, the "committer" information is > > so important to the point of completely screwing the repo history with > > tons of noise? > > > > > > Anyway, really nice job! > > I completely agree. The default should be a fast forward then there > should be an option to select non fast forward next to the merge > button.
I even talk about taking it further than FF merge, just do a rebase, so you don't have merges at all, unless you are really merging long lived branches or large topic branches. Just as a reminder, this is why I ended up building a too, to "merge" pull request by rebasing them instead of merging: https://github.com/sociomantic/git-hub -- Leandro Lucarella (AKA luca) http://llucax.com.ar/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- GPG Key: 5F5A8D05 (F8CD F9A7 BF00 5431 4145 104C 949E BFB6 5F5A 8D05) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Se ha dicho tanto que las apariencias engañan Por supuesto que engañarán a quien sea tan vulgar como para creerlo _______________________________________________ dmd-internals mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals
