On 8/12/2015 10:35 PM, Martin Nowak via dmd-internals wrote:
On Thursday, 13 August 2015 at 02:58:00 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Let's do that then.
Yep, 2.067 sounds good and it seems one of gdc/ldc will have a 2.067 before
2.069.
How about doing a PR for the sources? Seems to me we're just sitting around
jawboning, and not moving forward!
This discussion is necessary. Switching to ddmd is a big change with lots of
consequences and you should be willing to spent some time to make better
decisions.
This discussion is good. Delaying the PR to get the D sources in git is not so
good. I don't see any reason for further delay.
_______________________________________________
dmd-internals mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals
