On 6/27/2016 5:24 AM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
As usual Walter, the answer is to not push incremental changes to master but instead to develop them in a branch.
Small changes are easier to review. Large ones don't get reviewed at all, or get nitpicks like bikeshedding over spelling, or somebody just holds their breath and pulls it.
Maybe doing things as branches works in other organizations where people can gather in the conference room and go over it together, but I don't think it works for us where we work fairly independently in multiple timezones.
_______________________________________________ dmd-internals mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals
