As newer CPUs have larger and larger cache, using kB to represent the
cache size is getting less convenient. Reuse the same function we have
for system memory size so that large units will be used as
appropriate. For example, a cache size reported as "20 MB" looks nicer
than as "20480 kB".
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelv...@suse.de>
---
dmidecode.c | 17 +++++++++++------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- dmidecode.orig/dmidecode.c 2018-12-11 12:50:32.762493048 +0100
+++ dmidecode/dmidecode.c 2018-12-11 12:55:34.948912010 +0100
@@ -1560,17 +1560,22 @@ static void dmi_cache_size(u16 code)
static void dmi_cache_size_2(u32 code)
{
+ u64 size;
+
if (code & 0x80000000)
{
code &= 0x7FFFFFFFLU;
- /* Use a more convenient unit for large cache size */
- if (code >= 0x8000)
- printf(" %u MB", code >> 4);
- else
- printf(" %u kB", code << 6);
+ size.l = code << 6;
+ size.h = code >> 26;
}
else
- printf(" %u kB", code);
+ {
+ size.l = code;
+ size.h = 0;
+ }
+
+ /* Use a more convenient unit for large cache size */
+ dmi_print_memory_size(size, 1);
}
static void dmi_cache_types(u16 code, const char *sep)
--
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support
_______________________________________________
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dmidecode-devel
