Use the standard PCI device format (bus:dev.fn) to designate the
parent PCI device of the USB port, so it is much easier to lookup
in the output of lspci for example.
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelv...@suse.de>
Cc: Jerry Hoemann <jerry.hoem...@hpe.com>
---
Jerry, what do you think? This would make the PCI device presentation
consistent with what we do for type 203.
dmioem.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- dmidecode.orig/dmioem.c 2022-06-01 09:52:29.238550207 +0200
+++ dmidecode/dmioem.c 2022-06-01 09:57:30.181528594 +0200
@@ -666,9 +666,8 @@ static int dmi_decode_hp(const struct dm
if (h->length < 0x0F) break;
if (!(opt.flags & FLAG_QUIET))
pr_attr("Associated Handle", "0x%04X",
WORD(data + 0x4));
- pr_attr("PCI Bus of Parent USB", "0x%04X", data[0x6]);
- pr_attr("PCI Device of Parent USB", "0x%04X", data[0x7]
>> 3);
- pr_attr("PCI Function of Parent USB", "0x%04X",
data[0x7] & 0x7);
+ pr_attr("PCI Device", "%02x:%02x.%x", data[0x6],
+ data[0x7] >> 3, data[0x7] & 0x7);
dmi_hp_238_loc("Location", data[0x8]);
dmi_hp_238_flags("Management Port", WORD(data + 0x9));
pr_attr("Port Instance", "%d", data[0xB]);
--
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support
_______________________________________________
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dmidecode-devel
