Le mer. 10 déc. 2025 à 13:07, Jean Delvare <[email protected]> a écrit :
> [...]
>
> The port length is displayed separately (same as other port types), so
> for example the output for an E1.S port would look like:
>
> Handle 0x00BD, DMI type 9, 23 bytes
> System Slot Information
> Designation: EDSFF port 1
> Type: EDSFF E1
> (...)
> Length: Short
> ID: 1
>
> Is that OK with you, or would you prefer a different presentation?
>
>
This reporting is correct from a specification standpoint but this requires
people to read it like Type=E1 + Length=Short = E1.S
In the infra world, everyone considers E1.S as a common name.
So ideally, I'd love to get an exception on this reporting to get the
following output:
Handle 0x00BD, DMI type 9, 23 bytes
System Slot Information
Designation: EDSFF port 1
Type: EDSFF E1.S
(...)
Length: Short
ID: 1
We'd keep the length to report the actual physical slot size but add a .S
or .L in the port type to get a name that matters/make sense for users.
This way the Type is closer to the real world naming and hardware
specificaitions.
WDYT ?
Erwan,
