I think the intention is to allow interworking between 2 operators' network 
domains if the operators choose to do so. Yet operators may not choose to do 
that. So the DMM solution can only enable such choice. Also, it can do that 
only if the security measures allow. 

How about the following:

The DMM solution SHOULD enable working between trusted administrative domains 
when allowed by the security measures deployed between these domains. 
Furthermore, the DMM solution SHOULD preserve backwards compatibility with 
existing network deployment and end hosts. 

H Anthony Chan

-----Original Message-----
From: Charles E. Perkins [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 5:56 PM
To: h chan
Cc: [email protected]; Peter McCann; jouni korhonen
Subject: Re: [DMM] draft requirement REQ-4: compatibility

Hello folks,

On 6/5/2012 10:26 AM, h chan wrote:
> Replacing REQ-4 with the following:
>
> REQ-4: compatibility
> The DMM solution MUST NOT break when being deployed between trusted 
> administrative domains and SHOULD allow inter-working with the security 
> measures deployed between these domains. Existing network deployment and end 
> hosts also SHOULD NOT break.

I understand the intent, but specifying that something "SHOULD NOT break"
seems almost like berating the children.

How about:

"The DMM solution is required to work between trusted administrative domains
   and SHOULD allow inter-working with the security measures deployed 
between
   these domains. Furthermore, the DMM solution must preserve backwards
   compatibility with existing network deployment and end hosts."

I have two more issues:

- You cannot guarantee inter-working with completely arbitrary security 
measures.
- I am confident that the DMM solution will require security.  Thus, the 
"SHOULD"
   in the above text is somehow incorrect.

I'm not sure exactly how best to resolve these latter two issues, but 
before I
try to make a resolution, I thought it would be good to raise the issue 
on this
list for possible further discussion.

-- 
Regards,
Charlie P.

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

Reply via email to