了DSaD 在 2012-6-27 上午3:00， <[email protected]>写道：
> If you have received this digest without all the individual message > attachments you will need to update your digest options in your list > subscription. To do so, go to > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm > > Click the 'Unsubscribe or edit options' button, log in, and set "Get > MIME or Plain Text Digests?" to MIME. You can set this option > globally for all the list digests you receive at this point. > > > > Send dmm mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of dmm digest..." > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: WG Call for adoption: draft-chan-dmm-requirements-02 > (jouni korhonen) > 2. Re: WG Call for adoption: draft-chan-dmm-requirements-02 > (Ahmad Muhanna) > 3. Re: WG Call for adoption: draft-chan-dmm-requirements-02 > ([email protected]) > 4. Re: WG Call for adoption: draft-chan-dmm-requirements-02 > (Marco Liebsch) > 5. Re: WG Call for adoption: draft-chan-dmm-requirements-02 > ([email protected]) > > > ---------- 已转发邮件 ---------- > From: jouni korhonen <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Cc: > Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 23:56:16 +0300 > Subject: Re: [DMM] WG Call for adoption: draft-chan-dmm-requirements-02 > > <as a WG contributor> > > I favor adopting this document. > > - Jouni > > > On Jun 20, 2012, at 11:52 AM, jouni korhonen wrote: > > > Folks, > > > > We have a good start with the requirements document in > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-chan-dmm-requirements-02 > > and the chairs think it is time to catch up with the > > charter regarding the Solution Requirements. We are a bit > > ahead purposely so that we have one official document to > > work on and discuss before the face to face meeting in > > Vancouver. > > > > This email starts a 2-week consensus call on adopting > > > > Title : Requirements of distributed mobility management > > Author(s) : H Anthony Chan > > Filename : draft-chan-dmm-requirements-02.txt > > Pages : 16 > > Date : 2012-06-14 > > > > as a DMM WG document. Please, read the current revision and state > > you opinion either for or against adoption (and with reasoning why) > > in the mailing list. The call for adoption ends 4th July 2012. > > > > - Jouni & Julien > > > > > ---------- 已转发邮件 ---------- > From: Ahmad Muhanna <[email protected]> > To: jouni korhonen <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Cc: > Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 22:29:22 +0000 > Subject: Re: [DMM] WG Call for adoption: draft-chan-dmm-requirements-02 > Hello Jouni, Anthony and All, > > I have read the draft and I support adopting it as a WG document. > > However, I have the following comment. It is not necessary to address the > comment now but I believe it needs to be addressed at one point. > > The draft under section 1. "Introduction" says: > " > The key idea is that dynamic mobility management relaxes > some constraints while also repositioning mobility anchors; it avoids > the establishment of non optimal tunnels between two topologically > distant anchors. > " > > My question: Is NOT true that the above key idea can be achieved by the > proper choice of deployment and policy? > > If the answer is yes: Then, I assume that we are not expecting any new > protocol but some recommendations on to how to achieve the above. > > Thanks for all the good work and effort! > > Best Regards, > Ahmad > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > jouni korhonen > Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 3:56 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [DMM] WG Call for adoption: draft-chan-dmm-requirements-02 > > > <as a WG contributor> > > I favor adopting this document. > > - Jouni > > > On Jun 20, 2012, at 11:52 AM, jouni korhonen wrote: > > > Folks, > > > > We have a good start with the requirements document in > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-chan-dmm-requirements-02 > > and the chairs think it is time to catch up with the charter regarding > > the Solution Requirements. We are a bit ahead purposely so that we > > have one official document to work on and discuss before the face to > > face meeting in Vancouver. > > > > This email starts a 2-week consensus call on adopting > > > > Title : Requirements of distributed mobility management > > Author(s) : H Anthony Chan > > Filename : draft-chan-dmm-requirements-02.txt > > Pages : 16 > > Date : 2012-06-14 > > > > as a DMM WG document. Please, read the current revision and state you > > opinion either for or against adoption (and with reasoning why) in the > > mailing list. The call for adoption ends 4th July 2012. > > > > - Jouni & Julien > > _______________________________________________ > dmm mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm > > > > ---------- 已转发邮件 ---------- > From: <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Cc: > Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 09:02:59 +0000 > Subject: Re: [DMM] WG Call for adoption: draft-chan-dmm-requirements-02 > Hi all, > > I am in favour of adopting this document as a DMM WG document! > > Best regards, > Georgios > > > > > On Jun 20, 2012, at 11:52 AM, jouni korhonen wrote: > > > > > Folks, > > > > > > We have a good start with the requirements document in > > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-chan-dmm-requirements-02 > > > and the chairs think it is time to catch up with the charter regarding > > > the Solution Requirements. We are a bit ahead purposely so that we > > > have one official document to work on and discuss before the face to > > > face meeting in Vancouver. > > > > > > This email starts a 2-week consensus call on adopting > > > > > > Title : Requirements of distributed mobility management > > > Author(s) : H Anthony Chan > > > Filename : draft-chan-dmm-requirements-02.txt > > > Pages : 16 > > > Date : 2012-06-14 > > > > > > as a DMM WG document. Please, read the current revision and state you > > > opinion either for or against adoption (and with reasoning why) in the > > > mailing list. The call for adoption ends 4th July 2012. > > > > > > - Jouni & Julien > > > > _______________________________________________ > > dmm mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm > > > > ---------- 已转发邮件 ---------- > From: Marco Liebsch <[email protected]> > To: jouni korhonen <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 14:12:36 +0000 > Subject: Re: [DMM] WG Call for adoption: draft-chan-dmm-requirements-02 > I support adopting the document as base for a WG document. > > marco > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > >jouni korhonen > >Sent: Mittwoch, 20. Juni 2012 10:52 > >To: [email protected] > >Cc: [email protected] > >Subject: [DMM] WG Call for adoption: draft-chan-dmm-requirements-02 > > > >Folks, > > > >We have a good start with the requirements document in > >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-chan-dmm-requirements-02 > >and the chairs think it is time to catch up with the charter regarding the > >Solution Requirements. We are a bit ahead purposely so that we have one > >official document to work on and discuss before the face to face meeting > in > >Vancouver. > > > >This email starts a 2-week consensus call on adopting > > > > Title : Requirements of distributed mobility management > > Author(s) : H Anthony Chan > > Filename : draft-chan-dmm-requirements-02.txt > > Pages : 16 > > Date : 2012-06-14 > > > >as a DMM WG document. Please, read the current revision and state you > >opinion either for or against adoption (and with reasoning why) in the > mailing > >list. The call for adoption ends 4th July 2012. > > > >- Jouni & Julien > >_______________________________________________ > >dmm mailing list > >[email protected] > >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm > > > > ---------- 已转发邮件 ---------- > From: <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 17:35:21 +0200 > Subject: Re: [DMM] WG Call for adoption: draft-chan-dmm-requirements-02 > Dear all, > I am also in favour of WG adoption of the draft since it discusses very > detailed motivation, problems, and requirements of DMM approach. > > To the authors: I propose to take in to consideration correction of some > very minor nits as follows in the next version: > > Page 6: > In Fig. 1 beside LMA/MAG for PMIP also a FA is shown with MIPv6 referenced > - shouldn't this be then the MN directly? > > [Paper-New.Perspective] is not referenced > > Page 7: > mobility management functional blocks can be groups => mobility management > functional blocks can be grouped > > will retrieve the location information of an MN is stored. => will > retrieve the stored location information of an MN./will retrieve the > location information of an MN which is stored in the table. > > Page 8: > deployment in Section 4 => deployment in Section 3.1 > > Page 9: > a stable IP home IP address => a stable IP home address / a stable home IP > address > > Page 10: > dmm => DMM (3 times) > > Page 11: > O-PS2: Complicated deployment with too many variants and extensions > of MIP Deployment is complicated with many variants and > extensions of MIP. When introducing new functions which may > add to the complicity, existing solutions are more vulnerable > => > O-PS2: Complicated deployment with too many variants and extensions > of MIP > > Deployment is complicated with many variants and extensions of > MIP. When introducing new functions which may add to the > complexity, existing solutions are more vulnerable > > > > Best regards > Dirk > > > Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von > jouni korhonen > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. Juni 2012 10:52 > An: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Betreff: [DMM] WG Call for adoption: draft-chan-dmm-requirements-02 > > Folks, > > We have a good start with the requirements document in > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-chan-dmm-requirements-02 > and the chairs think it is time to catch up with the > charter regarding the Solution Requirements. We are a bit > ahead purposely so that we have one official document to > work on and discuss before the face to face meeting in > Vancouver. > > This email starts a 2-week consensus call on adopting > > Title : Requirements of distributed mobility management > Author(s) : H Anthony Chan > Filename : draft-chan-dmm-requirements-02.txt > Pages : 16 > Date : 2012-06-14 > > as a DMM WG document. Please, read the current revision and state > you opinion either for or against adoption (and with reasoning why) > in the mailing list. The call for adoption ends 4th July 2012. > > - Jouni & Julien > _______________________________________________ > dmm mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm > > > _______________________________________________ > dmm mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm > >
_______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
