H Anthony, Yes, this reflects Sri's and my suggestion about removal of MN/MR qualifier. I agree with the idea of the new text as you put it.
Then, if I re-read just like that, there still seems to be some difficulty to my brain to understand: Le 01/08/2012 23:35, h chan a écrit :
The DMM solutions MUST provide transparency above the IP layer when needed, such as upon change of point of attachment to the Internet, for the application flows that cannot cope with a change of IP address. Otherwise the support to maintain a stable home IP address or prefix during handover may be declined.
I don't understand the last phrase - the 'otherwise' relates to the first MUST? Or to the latter 'cannot'? But this may be just nitpicking on the use of language. I agree with the direction of the idea and thank you for having provided the modification. Alex _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
