Hi Charlie, On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Charles E. Perkins <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Behcet, > > I'm very curious: > > > On 9/26/2012 1:08 PM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote: > >> With the cloud, two mobility entities may now become IPv6 neighbors in the >> cloud. Trying to define signaling between such entities maybe no longer a >> big issue. With cloud, DMM's premise somewhat disappears. We need to find a >> new premise. > > > How is it that the mobility entities are "more neighborly" than they would > be > in physical IPv6 networks? > > How would there be information about whether the mobility entities > are in the same cloud or different clouds? >
In case of cloud networks, this is the only case we have to worry about. In dmm it is always the case. That is the difference. > I do think that clouds are interesting, but it's not immediately obvious > to me how they change the fundamental nature of the DMM problem. > Of course it would :-). Regards, Behcet _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
