Hi Juan Carlos, On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Zuniga, Juan Carlos <[email protected]> wrote: > I believe the purpose of the discussion was to propose some requirement > text for draft-ietf-dmm-requirements, rather than getting in the > solution space. I propose the following: >
Absolutely, let's not lose time on this. > Requirement: DMM solutions SHOULD support multicast services. In case > the solution > does not address multicast, a justification MUST be provided > for the > omission of multicast from the solution. OK. Justification could be out of scope. > > Motivation: The purpose of this requirement is to encourage people to > consider the impacts of running multicast services in a DMM > environment > from the beginning of the development, thereby avoiding the > need to > make protocol extensions in the future to support this kind of > functionality. > Agreed. Regards, Behcet _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
