Hi Pierrick, all, |IMHO, if we should keep only one PS, it would be PS#2 :-)
How about combining PS1 and PS2? |I agree that conditional mobility support, depending on application |capability, is a key requirement. However, I think that this |requirement is orthogonal to the distribution of mobility management |functions; actually, we may have the same requirement with centralized |mobility management, right? You are right, it is orthogonal. | This is not really a DMM issue Indeed, but if we're to design a modern mobility management solution then it should be considered from the beginning, right? Best Regards, Kostas _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
