Charlie,
Right, sorry for missing these.
- jouni
6/3/2014 8:37 AM, Charlie Perkins kirjoitti:
Hello Jouni,
I communicated three issues:
- The gap does not explain the gaps between the requirements and
FMIP / [seamoby] documents / [hokey]
- The document does not explain the relevance of the SIPTO example
in fulfilling the requirements. In fact, SIPTO has "limited mobility
support".
- The document uses terminology "LMs" and "LMc" that could be
improved. Almost every existing IETF approach refers to some sort
of "binding management", and it would be better to stay aligned
with that. This is especially true lately, since "location
management"
is relevant to advertisements and even surveillance.
Regards,
Charlie P.
On 6/2/2014 9:25 PM, Jouni Korhonen wrote:
Folks,
The WGLC has ended for this I-D. There was one comment on the list:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dmm/current/msg01152.html
I also sent few editorial/typo correction comments offline to the
authors while doing my review for the proto write-up.
We take the I-D passed the WGLC #2 but a new quick revision to
include the two comments is needed before we ship the I-D out of the WG.
- Jouni (as a DMM co-chair)
5/26/2014 6:39 AM, Jouni Korhonen kirjoitti:
Folks,
This email starts a one week WGLC #2 for
draft-ietf-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-04. Issue you comments to the
mailing list and place possible tickets to the issue tracker. There are
quite a few changed mainly to tackle Charlie's comments.
The WGLC ends 2ns June 2014 EOB (EEST). Silence is accounted as an
acceptance for the content.
- Jouni (as a DMM co-chair)
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
