Hi Alex, > -----Original Message----- > From: dmm [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Alexandru Petrescu > Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 9:47 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [DMM] offlisted mails - names of Work Teams > > Le 24/10/2014 18:17, Brian Haberman a écrit : > > Alex (and others), > > > > On 10/24/14 11:00 AM, Alexandru Petrescu wrote: > >> But under no circumstances should they become unaccountable with > >> respect to the WG at large. > > > > Please (re-)read what I posted about these teams a little while ago. > > > > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dmm/current/msg01627.html > > Thank you for the pointer, I've read and re-read it at the time. > > It increased my confidence to re-think again the same thing: we dont > know whether these are Design Teams RFC2418, or something else. > > I dont know what to expect as output. > > I dont know what does this mean to the future of Mobile IP? > > Are the 3 teams going to produce a competitor to Mobile IP? Is Mobile > IP becoming Historic? > > Is Mobile IP Network Mobility taken into account in these teams? > > Is Network Mobility considered from the start, or as an afterthought > (like NEMO after Mobile IP, PrefixDelegationPMIP after PMIP)? > > Are the earlier RFCs considered? > > My remarks to the Charter proposal got rejected in this respect.
Based on what I can tell, these three focused areas are still calling for an IP mobility protocol. It could be based on MIP/PMIP, or on some new protocol like AERO. Thanks - Fred [email protected] > Alex > > > > > Regards, > > Brian > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > dmm mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm > > > > > _______________________________________________ > dmm mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
