On 10/29/14 1:33 PM, Alexandru Petrescu wrote: > Le 29/10/2014 18:25, Brian Haberman a écrit : >> Alex, >> >> On 10/29/14 1:17 PM, Alexandru Petrescu wrote: >>> Sorr not the intention for surrendering anyone, just some thoughts. >> >> I think there is a language/communication problem here. >> >> DMM is chartered to handle the maintenance of all mobility protocols >> developed within the IETF. >> >>> >>> Do you think Mobile IPv6 needs improved implementations? >>> >> >> I believe *all* implementations (not just mobility protocols) could be >> improved. But, I don't think that is the question you are asking... >> >> I *think* the question you are asking is: "Are there enhancements that >> can be made to the Mobile IPv6 specifications?" >> >> Is that what you are asking? > > I agree yes. Are there enhancements that can be made to the Mobile IPv6 > specs in particular RFC6275, RFC3963, RFC4877, RFC6276.
I personally do not know. But as Jouni suggested, write a draft on the enhancements you want to see and get feedback. Regards, Brian > > Yours, > > Alex > >> >> Regards, >> Brian >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dmm mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm >> >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
