Charlie,
Actually, it did make it to the list. I suspect that someone on
the list had a MTA/MUA issue that caused a mail routing loop. That
routing loop was the basis for the bounce message to you.Brian On 10/29/14 11:05 PM, Charlie Perkins wrote: > > This email to the list bounced earlier today...! > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [DMM] Maintenance of Mobile IPv6 > Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:19:37 -0700 > From: Charlie Perkins <[email protected]> > To: Alexandru Petrescu <[email protected]> > CC: [email protected] <[email protected]> > > > > Hello Alex and all, > > Interesting discussion. Here's my take. > > On 10/29/2014 10:03 AM, Alexandru Petrescu wrote: > >> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> - help with automated portal authentication in WLAN. Hopping on and >> off from a WiFi hotspot to another, even without moving physically, >> is often obstructed by web portal authentication requiring user >> to type to fill forms; this is not only inconvenient, but in some >> cases it is impossible, like with vehicular networks where the >> driver is forbidden by law to type while behind the wheel. > > I would love to work on this. If you have ideas, please describe. > >> >> >> - bugs in an otherwise reliable Mobile IPv6 implementation of >> a particular equipment manufacturer (HA never deletes a tunnel, >> lifetime: remaining never): should the bugs be corrected or shoudl >> the spec modified to reflect what the implementation actually >> does? Should protocol workarounds be designed to deal with this >> problem? > > My answers: (1) no, and (2) not within [dmm]. > >> >> - future of the maintenance of the linux open source Mobile IPv6 >> implementation: just for my clarification - is it still ok? Is there >> some project behind it? Or is it dying? Currently the email list >> seems silent, and the latest software releases date back to more than >> one year. > > If [dmm] shows itself to be a credible force, the open source problems > will naturally get the proper attention. But it shouldn't be on the > [dmm] charter. > >> >> - elimination, or reducing the effect, of the necessity of the 'focal >> point' Home Agent: route optimization for the masses and for moving >> networks as deployed in vehicles. > > Isn't this already on the radar for [dmm]? > >> >> - Mobile IPv6 and IPv6 NAT Traversal; >> >> - IPv6 NAT in a moving network; >> >> - bypassing Mobile IPv6 implementation (and use IPv6 NATting) in cases >> of particular applications, based on destination IPv6 address and >> IPv6-only-when-reversed FQDN name. >> >> - the use of ULAs combined with Global addresses, with Mobile IPv6 >> (e.g. ULA HoA but GUA CoA, or reverse). > > For these four items, it will depend on whether there is a constituency > for action. > > > And, one more thing: > > On 10/29/2014 10:46 AM, Alexandru Petrescu wrote: >> Le 29/10/2014 18:40, Brian Haberman a écrit : >>> >>> >>> On 10/29/14 1:33 PM, Alexandru Petrescu wrote: >>>> >>>> I agree yes. Are there enhancements that can be made to the Mobile >>>> IPv6 >>>> specs in particular RFC6275, RFC3963, RFC4877, RFC6276. >>> >>> I personally do not know. But as Jouni suggested, write a draft on the >>> enhancements you want to see and get feedback. >> >> Brian - thank you for the invitation. Maybe I will do. >> >> Now that the deadline passed it's for the next year. I will keep a >> mark on these emails. > > You don't have to wait! In fact you can submit a draft even on the > first day of the IETF. > > For the four topics above, that would be very appropriate, I think. > > Regards, > Charlie P. > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > dmm mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
