Hi Alper,

For an application developer, if there are three kinds of addresses to use 
which are "Fixed IP Address", "Sustained IP Address" and "Nomadic IP Address",

then I believe the developer would always wants to use the "Fixed IP address", 
rather than the other ones. Because even though the application could cope with 
IP address

change, but the IP address change is not what the application want.



-Xinpeng





________________________________
发件人: Alper Yegin [[email protected]]
发送时间: 2015年3月27日 2:13
收件人: Weixinpeng (Jackie)
抄送: Dapeng Liu; [email protected]
主题: Re: Re: DMM API

Hi Xinpeng,

If your app knows how to deal with IP address changes, then it's better if we 
give it a chance to do so, because (as the I-D explains):


   Achieving IP session continuity and IP address reachability by using
   Mobile IP incurs some cost.  Mobile IP protocol forces the mobile
   host's IP traffic to traverse a centrally-located router (Home Agent,
   HA), which incurs additional transmission latency and use of
   additional network resources, adds to the network CAPEX and OPEX, and
   decreases the reliability of the network due to the introduction of a
   single point of failure [I-D.ietf-dmm-requirements].  Therefore, IP
   session continuity and IP address reachability should be be provided
   only when needed.


Alper

On Mar 26, 2015, at 7:39 PM, Weixinpeng (Jackie) wrote:

Hi Alper
My understanding about the reason why there needs to define serval types of IP 
prefixes is that,  if the application itself could deal with the change of IP 
address, i.e. the application itself could deal with session continuty in case 
of IP address change, so the host would choose a normadic address otherwise the 
host should choose a sustained address.
But my question is that, if the application could deal with session continuty 
itself, does that mean the application is willing to change its IP address? 
Because even though a new address might bring some kinds of benefit, but it 
will also
bring additional cost for application to deal with IP address change.
Thanks.



Xinpeng





________________________________
发件人: dmm [[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] 代表 Dapeng Liu 
[[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
发送时间: 2015年3月26日 5:01
收件人: Alper Yegin
抄送: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
主题: [DMM] 回复: DMM API

Hello Alper,

I still have the following comments:

1. Regarding the definition of “fixed IP address” in the draft:

  “- Fixed IP Address

   This is what standard Mobile IP provides with a Home Address (HoA).
   The mobile host is configures a HoA from a centrally-located Home
   Network.  Both IP session continuity and IP address reachability are
   provided to the mobile host with the help of a router in the Home
   Network (Home Agent, HA).  This router acts as an anchor for the IP

address of the mobile host.”

If this is equal to HoA, then RFC5014 already cover that. We do not need to 
repeat it here with another name.

2. Regarding the definition of “sustained IP address” in the draft:


"- Sustained IP Address

   This type of IP address provides IP session continuity but not IP
   address reachability.  It is achieved by ensuring that the IP address
   used at the beginning of the session remains usable despite the
   movement of the mobile host.  The IP address may change after the
   termination of the IP session(s), therefore it does not exhibit
   persistence.
"

There is no clear dividing line between fixed IP address and sustained IP 
address. Whether the IP address is used for reachability is not determined by 
the IP address itself. For example, even when the MN get a HoA, after it moves 
to another location of the network, it may decide to release current HoA and 
get another HoA, in this case the "fixed IP address" becomes a "sustained IP 
address".

Further more, the reachability normally is implemented by domain name instead 
of IP address. For example, we reach “Google” by its domain name, never by it’s 
server’s IP address.

Using temporary private IP address we can also achieve the goal of 
“reachability”. For example, using dynamic DNS, as shown in  
http://hsk.oray.com/ , it can  provide reachability even the host get a private 
IP address.

3. Regarding the definition of “nomadic IP address”:

“- Nomadic IP Address

   This type of IP address provides neither IP session continuity nor IP
   address reachability.  The IP address is obtained from the serving IP
   gateway and it is not maintained across gateway changes.  In other
   words, the IP address may be released and replaced by a new IP
   address when the IP gateway changes due to the movement of the mobile

host.”

Seems this IP address is the IP address that we normally used in most cases. If 
this is the case, why we need a new name for it?


--
Dapeng Liu

在 2015年3月25日 星期三,下午2:02,Alper Yegin 写道:
Hello Dapeng and Alex,

I hope you had a chance to digest our responses to your comments and questions 
about the API work.
If you have any remaining issues, please let us know over the email at your 
earliest convenience.
It'd be good if you can articulate them in detail.


Thanks.

Alper



_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

Reply via email to