Hi Alper, Please note that we still need mailing list confirmation for call for adoption of the API document. So even now we can not say that we have “common udnerstadning“ from the group. Your claim of “common understanding across the WG” is not exist. As Brian mentioned, agreement within WT or among draft authors does not mean it is the consensus of the group. The group should always keep open and welcome anyone to ask any question.
-- Dapeng Liu 在 2015年3月26日 星期四，下午4:19，Alper Yegin 写道： > Hi Xinpeng, > > On Mar 26, 2015, at 10:49 PM, Weixinpeng (Jackie) wrote: > > > I think it's good to start serval work teams to process the work. > > If there are some people complain about this, I think the reason would be > > that it > > might be not convient for them to participate in the online interim meeting > > for reasons such as timezone etc. > > > > > It's always a challenge to find timeslots that works for everyone, > considering the around-the-world participation in DMM (in a way, that's true > :-) > > > My another feeling is that after the forming of teams there is really rare > > discussion in the maillist where should > > be the main discussing place of IETF. So my suggestion is that even though > > there are work teams, please also > > bring the discussion to mail list. > > > > > That's why we, WT leaders, publish meeting notes, so that people who were not > at the meeting can join the discussion on the mailing list, > and this is, again, why WT leaders present the status at each IETF meeting. > > My issue is….. some people don't read the meeting notes.. they don't read the > I-D. they don't follow the email discussions. They don't even remember what > we presented at the previous IETF and established as common understanding > across the WG. They don't bring up any discussion for things that has been > out there at least 2 IETF meeting cycles… And then! ask questions as if this > is the first time we are presenting it (for very specific example: need for 3 > distinct types of IP addresses). And then, this causing us significant amount > of productivity loss…. > > Alper > > > > > Thanks. > > > > -Xinpeng > > > > ________________________________________ > > 发件人: dmm [[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])] 代表 Brian > > Haberman [[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])] > > 发送时间: 2015年3月27日 2:53 > > 收件人: [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) > > 主题: [DMM] DMM work teams > > > > DMM WG, > > I want to, once again, clarify the guiding principles for the DMM > > work teams. Hopefully, this will make it clear to all participants how > > the work teams will influence the WG. The guiding principles are: > > > > 1. All work teams are open to input from anyone > > > > 2. Any work team holding a meeting will announce that meeting to the WG > > > > 3. Any document produced by a work team is treated as any individual draft > > > > 4. Anyone can publish alternative proposals and ask the WG to consider them > > > > 5. WG consensus will drive the adoption of any solutions drafts (work > > team generated or otherwise). > > > > If you have any questions about the above, please contact me. > > > > Regards, > > Brian > > _______________________________________________ > > dmm mailing list > > [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm > > > > > _______________________________________________ > dmm mailing list > [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm > >
_______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
