[as an individual contributor] I support the idea of “Exposing mobility state to mobile nodes and network nodes” as described in our charter.
For this particular draft, after some offline discussion with the authors, I still have the following comments/suggestions: 1. Definition and distinction of "Fixed IP” and “Sustained IP” should be clear, more clarification text would be helpful. 2. Since we are trying to define API, opinion from application developers or OS vendors would be helpful. We can invite some of those experts to join the discussion. 3. Agree with Jouni’s opinion regarding the IPR, the group need to evaluate it. -- Dapeng Liu 在 2015年4月4日 星期六，上午8:03，Jouni Korhonen 写道： > Folks, > > This email starts a two week adoption call for the I-D > draft-yegin-dmm-ondemand-mobility-03 > to confirm its adoption as a DMM WG document and as a basis for the > technical solution. The call ends April 17th EOB PDT. > > Express your support or opposition to the mailing list. During the > IETF92 meeting we got 10 voices for the adoption and 3 against. we > expect at least the same amount of expressed opinions on the list. > > Notice that version -01 of this I-D had an IPR declared to it. See > https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2309/ > > - Jouni & Dapeng
_______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
