Hi Brian, > -----Original Message----- > From: dmm [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brian Haberman > Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 9:22 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [DMM] Mobility Exposure and Selection WT call > > > > On 4/27/15 11:53 AM, Templin, Fred L wrote: > > >> So, it is not actually a link-local address per the IPv6 Addressing > >> Architecture (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4291#section-2.5.6). > > > > Just because the AERO address Interface ID is not formed via EUI-64 > > does not mean that it is not a link-local address (see RFC7136, which > > updates RFC4291). RFC7421 gives further commentary. > > I am not referring to the IID of the link-local address. I am talking > about the 54 bits of zero which immediately follow the FE80::/10 prefix.
AERO leaves those 54 bits as zero - are you seeing some place in the spec where it does not appear that way? Thanks - Fred [email protected] _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
