Hi, I would like to suggest one additional identifier before publication: X.509 certificate as per Section 5.2 of Secure DHCPv6:
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dhc-sedhcpv6-08.txt Thanks - Fred [email protected] From: dmm [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Charlie Perkins Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 7:45 PM To: Sri Gundavelli (sgundave); jouni korhonen; [email protected]; Charlie Perkins Subject: Re: [DMM] RFC4283bis progress.. Hello folks, The last discussion about the document was related to whether or not Vehicle ID should be included in the draft. No resolution was reached for that discussion. However, the draft may still be considered ready for publication. Other ID formats can certainly be added in the future. Regards, Charlie P. On 7/9/2015 6:30 PM, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) wrote: I can review and provide comments. I think its ready for publication, may be after a minor edit. From: dmm <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of jouni korhonen <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Thursday, July 9, 2015 at 1:49 PM To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Charlie Perkins <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: [DMM] RFC4283bis progress.. Charlie, WG, In last IETF and slightly after that there was discussion about missing MN-IDs in the current -00 version. Have these been or rather will these be addressed? I'd like to move this trivial document forward. - Jouni & Dapeng _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
_______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
