Glad to get your comments, we will polish the expression in the next version.
2015-09-21 Z.W. Yan 发件人： 金子直樹 发送时间： 2015-09-21 16:21:42 收件人： dmm 抄送： 主题： Re: [DMM] Review request for the Home Network Prefix Renumbering inPMIPv6 Dear all, I have reviewed the draft carefully. The solution makes sense, but the express should be polished further. For example, some abbreviation are given their full name, while some are not (DHCP, RA, etc.). Please check it. Best regards, N. Kaneko 2015-09-18 16:30 GMT+09:00 [email protected] <[email protected]>: Hi, all, I have read the draft carefully and found it useful. HNP renumbering is necessary in many scenarios. One problem in the draft is the citation of RFC documents, e.g. sometimes [RFCXXXX], sometimes RFCXXXX. Please unify them. Regards, Bohao Hi all Kindly consider to review the draft "Home Network Prefix Renumbering in PMIPv6": https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yan-dmm-hnprenum/ Before the WG adoption call, authors are willing to get further comments and improve the draft. J. -- Jong-Hyouk Lee, living somewhere between /dev/null and /dev/random Protocol Engineering Lab., Sangmyung University #email: [email protected] #webpage: https://sites.google.com/site/hurryon [email protected] _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
_______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
