Yes, that's what I intended to ask.
Alex
Le 01/12/2015 15:59, Dhananjay Patki (dhpatki) a écrit :
Hi Alex,
The PBAs are only in response to the PBUs. If the parameters need to be
sent from the LMA to the MAG in an unsolicited manner to override
previously assigned values, then they could be included in Update
Notification message per RFC 7077. Is that what you intended to ask?
--
Regards,
Dhananjay
-----Original Message-----
From: dmm <[email protected]> on behalf of Alexandre Petrescu
<[email protected]>
Date: Tuesday, 1 December 2015 8:19 pm
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation:
draft-gundavelli-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params
I support this draft.
Let me ask: will it be possible for the LMA to send BAcks in an
unsolicited manner?
Alex
Le 25/11/2015 17:02, Dapeng Liu a écrit :
Hello all,
In IETF94, we initiated the call for adoption for the draft:
draft-gundavelli-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gundavelli-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params
Seems have got sufficient support during the meeting. We'd like to
confirm the call for adoption in the mailing list for 2 weeks.
Please send your opinion and comments to the list before December 9.
Thanks,
------
Best Regards,
Dapeng&Jouni
--
------
Best Regards,
Dapeng Liu
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
