Hi,
I also support the adoption.
However, I have a slight concern.I find Figure 1 little too specific and
it might mislead the audience.
Maybe the wording should be changed in order to emphasize that this is
just an instance.
Or else, I think the use case should be dropped.
However, having an example would be extremely helpful in understanding.
So I would suggest the former.
Regards,
IRU
On 12/4/2015 8:01 PM, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:
Hi,
I support adoption.
One little note: the -rg- in filename makes think of Research Group.
It would make sense to change the filename to avoid the use of -rg-,
if it's not too complicated.
Alex
Le 25/11/2015 17:22, Dapeng Liu a écrit :
Hello all,
In IETF94, we initiated the call for adoption for the draft:
draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02
<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02>:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02
Seems have got sufficient support during the meeting. We'd like to
confirm the call for adoption in the mailing list for 2 weeks.
Please send your opinion and comments to the list before December 9.
Thanks,
------
Best Regards,
Dapeng&Jouni
--
------
Best Regards,
Dapeng Liu
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
