Hi Seil, Revision 02 of this draft has been uploaded. The typos that you pointed out are addressed. -- Thanks, Dhananjay
-----Original Message----- From: dmm <[email protected]> on behalf of "Dhananjay S. Patki" <[email protected]> Date: Friday, 1 July 2016 at 9:33 AM To: Seil Jeon <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Cc: '成 鹏' <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [DMM] WGLC #2 for draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-01 >Hi Siel, > >Please see inline. >-- >Regards, >Dhananjay > >-----Original Message----- > > > >From: dmm <[email protected]> on behalf of Seil Jeon <[email protected]> >Date: Tuesday, 21 June 2016 at 2:38 PM >To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >Cc: '成 鹏' <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: [DMM] WGLC #2 for draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-01 > >>Hi, >> >>I have read this draft and some questions come to my mind. Let me know my >>understanding is correct or not first. >> >>Actually, this draft comes to a proposed container option to be delivered by >>a PBA message, enabling the LMA to put various parameters related to the MAG >>enforcement, not doing it individually for less signaling overhead(?) > >[Dhananjay] By ‘doing it individually’ do you mean separate options (instead >of sub-options) for Binding Update Control and Heartbeat Control? The idea is >to keep all such LMA controlled parameters grouped into a single container >option. > > >> >>And when I saw following sentence >> >>"Configuring aggressive values of parameters such as re-registration timeout >>and heartbeat interval can potentially create considerable signaling load on >>the LMA." >> >>I was expecting you would take care of it in terms of efficient transmission >>perspective as well. Is it out-of-scope, right? > >[Dhananjay] This extension is only to communicate the values enforced by the >LMA to the MAG. Tuning of the value for efficient transmission is out of scope >of this extension. The above sentence is only to state a caution which is >applicable even without using this extension. > >> >> >> >>Two minor typos are, >> >>In Introduction, aggresive -> aggressive >> >>in 5.2, reveived -> received(?) > >[Dhananjay] Thanks for pointing these out. I am correcting these in the next >version. > >Regards, >Dhananjay > >> >> >>Regards, >>Seil Jeon >> >> >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: dmm [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jouni Korhonen >>Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2016 2:14 AM >>To: [email protected]; Jouni; 成 鹏 >>Subject: [DMM] WGLC #2 for draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-01 >> >>Folks, >> >>This email starts the WGLC #2 for >>draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-01. Post your comment to the >>mailing list and also add your issues/correction requests/concerns etc into >>the Issue Tracker. >> >> WGLC #2 Starts: 6/7/2016 >> WGLC #2 Ends: 6/21/2016 EOB PDT >> >>Regards, >> Jouni & Dapeng >> >>_______________________________________________ >>dmm mailing list >>[email protected] >>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm >> >>_______________________________________________ >>dmm mailing list >>[email protected] >>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm >_______________________________________________ >dmm mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
