Le 24/07/2016 à 06:56, Jouni a écrit :
Folks,
As already supported in IETF96 Berlin meeting we are ratifying the
adoption of draft-chan-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring-08 as a WG
Item. The WG adoption call ends 8/7/2016. Voice you support or
opposition (with a reason why) on the mailing list.
I support adoption. I appreciate the direction this draft takes, but I
think there are some things to be further clarified:
- in addition to being reachable at a particular IP address, it should
be considered that an MN may send packets sourced by any address; a
mobile webcam can send its video by sourcing with any IP address
(provided there is no ingress filtering, which _is_ the case in some
networks).
- using a route update principle (BGP update, or other) there is
necessity to _delete_ the old routes, not only to create new routes.
- the role of default routes is very important in explaining the
viability of route update mechanisms.
If this draft is adopted, which I support, then later on I will help to
clarify the draft with respect to these 3 aspects.
Nits:
the data plane functions and be centralized but may also co-located
with the data plane function at these distributed anchors.
"may also _be_ co-located".
Alex
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
