I was gently reminded that even if mobility could be achieved by tunneling packets over Diameter AVPs, it is not really in the charter of the DMM.. yet!
..and now I will turn off the address autocompletion on this $ยข@#&^! email client ;-) - Jouni > On Feb 1, 2017, at 7:51 AM, jouni.nospam <[email protected]> wrote: > > Folks, > > We have asked for 1h slot for the IETF98. The main topic would be RFC4006bis. > We might have other short status/progress updates on Diameter group > signaling, and e2e security. > > - Jouni & Lionel > > > > >> Begin forwarded message: >> >> From: "\"IETF Meeting Session Request Tool\"" >> <[email protected]> >> Subject: dime - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 98 >> Date: January 31, 2017 at 5:13:31 PM PST >> To: <[email protected]> >> Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], >> [email protected] >> Resent-From: <[email protected]> >> Resent-To: [email protected], [email protected] >> >> >> >> A new meeting session request has just been submitted by Jouni Korhonen, a >> Chair of the dime working group. >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------- >> Working Group Name: Diameter Maintenance and Extensions >> Area Name: Operations and Management Area >> Session Requester: Jouni Korhonen >> >> Number of Sessions: 1 >> Length of Session(s): 1 Hour >> Number of Attendees: 150 >> Conflicts to Avoid: >> First Priority: detnet tsvwg tsvarea quic iccrg >> Second Priority: 6man v6ops intarea >> >> >> >> People who must be present: >> Stephen Farrell >> Lionel Morand >> Jouni Korhonen >> >> Resources Requested: >> Meetecho support in room >> >> Special Requests: >> >> --------------------------------------------------------- >> > _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
