Hi,

both changes look good to me.

Mirja


> Am 06.03.2017 um 03:13 schrieb Z.W. Yan <[email protected]>:
> 
> Hello, Mirja,
> Thank you for the review and comments on this draft, please check my in-line 
> responses below.
>  
>  
> 2017-03-06 
> Z.W. Yan
> 发件人: Mirja_Kühlewind 
> 发送时间: 2017-03-01  02:08:21 
> 收件人: The IESG 
> 抄送: draft-ietf-dmm-hnprenum; dmm-chairs; dmm; max.ldp 
> 主题: [DMM] 
> Mirja_Kühlewind's_No_Objection_on_draft-ietf-dmm-hnprenum-06:_(with_COMMENT) 
> Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-dmm-hnprenum-06: No Objection
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmm-hnprenum/
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> This document has a 2119 boilerplate but doesn't use normative language.
> I think it would actually be good to use normative language!
> Minor questions:
> - secion 4: "This temporary binding should only be used for the downwards
> packet transmission"
>   By downward you mean 'to the MN', right? 
>   Why is this? Does that actually help in any scenario?
> *** You are right, the presentaion "This temporary binding
>    should only be used for the downwards packet transmission and the LMA
>    should stop broadcasting the routing information about the old HNP if
>    the old HNP is no longer anchored at this LMA." may cause confusion and it 
> will be revised as "And the LMA
>    MUST stop broadcasting the routing information about the old HNP if
>    the old HNP is no longer anchored at this LMA." 
>  
> - I'm not sure why section 3 is titled 'PMIPv6 Extensions'...?
> *** Is "HNP Renumbering Procedure" better? 
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

Reply via email to