Hi Charlie, Please let the WG know how you plan to resolve this DISCUSS. Will be great if you can post your proposed changes to the group.
WG - Please provide your feedback and way-forward in this issue, by COB 19th of April. Regards Sri From: Sri Gundavelli <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Friday, March 24, 2017 at 10:30 AM To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Hakima Chaouchi <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Suresh Krishnan <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Charlie Perkins <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [DMM] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Folks, Please provide feedback on the following thread. Request for MN-Id based on other access technology specific identifiers was initially triggered by Hakima Chaouchi; May be Hakima and others can comment on this. Sri From: Suresh Krishnan <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Monday, March 13, 2017 at 8:14 PM To: Charlie Perkins <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [DMM] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Resent-From: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Resent-To: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Sri Gundavelli <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Resent-Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 21:14:56 -0700 Hi all, On Feb 28, 2017, at 4:32 PM, Charlie Perkins <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hello folks, It has been suggested that the dmm WG members should to provide more support for the inclusion of the MNIDs that are listed in draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-04. In order to resolve this issue, please send discussion to the [dmm] mailing list with thoughts about which of the types proposed in the draft are likely to require considerations about privacy when used in the Mobile Node Identifier option. Also, for the proposed types, it has been requested to make some discussion about how their inclusion will help to improve the Internet. This is a reminder to provide your inputs regarding the MNID types as Charlie has requested. Thanks Suresh
_______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
