Hi Ben,
On 5/16/17, 8:52 AM, "Ben Campbell" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> Yes, I do believe these options for indicating the >>registration/heartbeat >> timers do fall under the category of ³standard mobility options". Case >>and >> Point, RFC5847 defines an option for carrying ³RestartCounter² in a >>MIPv6 >> signaling message, which the protocol peer stores and uses that counter. >> In this example and as well in the current draft, the information >>elements >> carried in the option are in similar in nature, both are config >>parameters >> and these are elements that have influence on the protocol state >>machine. > >Thanks, that's helpful information. I think a sentence or two to that >effect would be useful in the draft. It probably doesn't need as much >detail as you gave here. I envision something to the effect of "The >options defined in this draft allow the configuration of re-registration >and heartbeat frequencies. These security considerations in [RFC5213] >apply." Sure, we will add couple of sentences and resolve this. Thanks for the review. Regards Sri _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
