> -----Message d'origine----- > De : Ben Campbell [mailto:[email protected]] > Envoyé : jeudi 3 août 2017 00:14 > À : The IESG > Cc : [email protected]; Jouni Korhonen; dmm- > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] > Objet : Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-dmm-mag-multihoming-04: > (with > COMMENT) > > Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-dmm-mag-multihoming-04: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email > addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory > paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmm-mag-multihoming/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I have a few editorial comments/nits: > > - There are several acronyms that should be expanded on first mention. > (including at least a couple that are expanded on _second_ mention (MAG and > LMA). > > - 3.2, "Per-packet management" bullet: The second sentence does not make > sense. >
This sentence will be removed > - 3.2, last paragraph: Are we really talking about the latency introduced by > per- > packet management, or jitter (i.e. variation in latency)? > We are talking about jitter. It will be clarified in next release. > - 4.1, definition of "Interface Label": This doesn't really define the term > "interface > label". It talks about how it is used, but not what it represents. > You're right... We will add definition of interface label in the terminology section.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
