> On Aug 30, 2017, at 3:55 PM, Ben Campbell <[email protected]> wrote: > > I apologize for taking a while to circle back on this—I missed the fact that > there was an update. > > Version 5 changes the assertion that “some of these identifiers” may be > considered private information to simply saying mobile identifiers are > private information, and changes the lower-case “should" encrypt to a MUST. > That resolves my DISCUSS point. I will clear.
Thanks a lot Ben for checking and clearing. Regards Suresh _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
