Thank you Dan, Sri, I agree with Dan in the all points, I’ll capture those in the next revision.
> Folks – Please review and provide your feedback on this document. Yes, that’s really appreciated. Cheers, --satoru > 2017/10/14 1:17、Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) <[email protected]>のメール: > > Thanks Daniel for your reviews. > > Folks – Please review and provide your feedback on this document. > > > Sri > > From: dmm <[email protected]> on behalf of "Voyer, Daniel" > <[email protected]> > Date: Friday, October 13, 2017 at 8:09 AM > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: [DMM] draft-matsushima-spring-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane > > Hi, > This is very good proposal. > > On Section 4. Mobile user plane > The core network doesn’t require to be SRv6 – it could be IPv6 only. This > demonstrate SRv6 flexibility. > > On Section 5.2. Layer-2 Anchor segment > Can you add more explanation to “In downlink, there's no difference between > the uplink behavior.” > > On section 7. Control plane considerations > The centralized controller should be marked as out-of-scope of this document. > > Thx > dan > > > _______________________________________________ > dmm mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
