Hello Sri,

Could you summarize Suresh's comments regarding the acceptance of segment routing within [6man] WG?  I think it is relevant to this discussion.

Regards,
Charlie P.


On 11/14/2017 4:02 PM, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) wrote:
Folks:

The following message commences a two week call for opinions on the adoption of draft-matsushima-spring-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-03 as a DMM Working document.

---
The DMM working group is considering adopting the draft, "draft-matsushima-spring-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-03” as a working group document. The chairs have polled the room for opinions during IETF100, and it was determined that there is good support for taking up this work. The chairs would like to confirm the same in the mailing list.  Please provide your feedback.

Document Link:
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-matsushima-spring-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-03.txt

Slides:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/100/materials/slides-100-dmm-srv6-for-mobile-user-plane/

Background:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/100/materials/slides-100-dmm-mobile-data-plane-evolution-motivation-goals/
---

Regards
Dapping & Sri



_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

Reply via email to