Hi Tom, Kalyani,
If the SR processing of the two SIDs is done by the end host, then I believe the results for SR are obviously not valid. Also in all the hardware-based routing platforms for which we have done interop https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-interop-00#section-2, we have SRv6 running at linecard rate. Note that I find this performance testing work interesting, and I’m willing to help you carry them. However, for next releases I would also consider leveraging projects like linux foundation fdio CSIT https://wiki.fd.io/view/CSIT/Description, in order to have a more methodical and accurate results (ILA has higher throughput than native IPv6 with a lower TPS). Thanks. Cheers, Pablo. ________________________________ De:Tom Herbert <[email protected]> Enviado:viernes, 16 de marzo de 2018 7:58 p. m. Para:Uma Chunduri Cc: dmm Asunto: Re: [DMM] some test results of different network overlay methods On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 12:40 PM, Uma Chunduri <[email protected]> wrote: > Great work, Thank you Kalyani & Tom. > > 2 quick questions: > > 1. I presume SR inline is just SRH with 2 SIDs as mentioned - didn't see the > topology used. Do intermediate nodes handle these SIDs, with pointer update > in SRH? Two hosts connected back to back. SR processing done by end host. > 2. Also for Geneve - it's IP4 encap and VNI no TLVs? > No TLVs. GUE uses RCO extension. Other than that all the variants should be out of the box with no options set. Encapsulations are v4/v4, SRv6 and ILA are all IPv6. I'll post the all the configuration scripts to github once I have some time.. Tom > -- > Uma C. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: dmm [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bogineni, Kalyani > Sent: Friday, March 16, 2018 11:16 AM > To: dmm <[email protected]> > Subject: [DMM] some test results of different network overlay methods > > > All: > > Here are some raw performance test results based on our understanding of the > different network overlay methods. We welcome discussion and comments. > > Kalyani and Tom > _______________________________________________ > dmm mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
_______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
