Yes, in the LS response that we sent to 3GPP on 2/16, we did cite the below work.
---- There are many proposals on this including: https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-feng-dmm-ra-prefixtype-01.txt https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-moses-dmm-dhcp-ondemand-mobility-08.txt Also, some proposals from the previous years, which may be related: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-mif-mpvd-ndp-support-03.txt https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-mif-mpvd-id-02.txt https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-bhandari-dhc-class-based-prefix-05.tx t https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kaiser-nd-pd-01 .... Sri On 3/22/18, 6:10 PM, "Erik Kline" <[email protected]> wrote: >> Also, some proposals from the previous years, which may be related: >> >> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-mif-mpvd-ndp-support-03.txt >> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-mif-mpvd-id-02.txt > >There's also the existing PvD work in int-area. > >I think PvDs may work well for this... _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
