Thank you Behcet, Ok, I was supposed that Alex is going to make a reference doc for GTP in IETF, and John is going to review GTP in ETSI.
As I mentioned at last DMM meeting, investigating GTP-U by IETF experts’s eyes is highly appreciated. Please see following link and find some GTP-U info. Maybe IETF-friendly style explanation is helpful for you. :-) https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/101/materials/slides-101-dmm-study-on-user-plane-protocol-at-3gpp-00 I’m really happy to cooperate with all people those who are interested in to work on it. Best regards, --satoru > 2018/03/31 0:26、Behcet Sarikaya <[email protected]>のメール: > > Hi Satoru, > > On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 12:12 AM, Satoru Matsushima > <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello John, > > If it would useful, I’d like to cooperate that GTP review work at user plane > point of view. Thanks. > > > > Thanks for the offer but I think you are confused of what is going on below > in the mails, so many people's mails including two John's, Jon Crowcroft and > John Grant. > > Reviewing GTP is an idea we have in 5gangip and currently Alex is taking the > lead. > As a GTP expert you are welcome to join him. > > Alex has this ambitious idea of writing a draft (not an RFC, we do not write > RFCs, some drafts become RFCs) on GTP which could be used as a reference to > GTP in IETF (to enable the operators to run GTP in IPv6). > > In our case, we encourage writing a requirements document for end to end > privacy enabled mapping system for 5G for which the starting point should be > the GTP and address the issues of tunneling and other aspects. > > I believe this has nothing to do with what is going on in dmm. > > Regards, > Behcet > > Cheers, > --satoru > > > 2018/03/29 19:38、John Grant <[email protected]>のメール: > > > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 4:49 AM, Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu at > > gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Le 23/03/2018 à 09:08, Jon Crowcroft a écrit : > > is there a technical reason we can't just re-visit MIPv6 in 5g in 2018? > > > > If it were up to me... > > > > To revisit, I would start looking at the tunnelling mechanism, identify > > what's missing from GTP, or how is it too heavy. > > > > That's something we're looking at in ETSI ISG NGP > > http://www.etsi.org/technologies-clusters/technologies/next-generation-protocols > > > > There's also a one-day workshop on the topic in Cambridge at the end of > > April > > https://www.cambridgewireless.co.uk/events/uk5g-death-ip-realising-opportunities-next-generat/ > > -- > > John Grant > > Nine Tiles, Cambridge, England > > +44 1223 862599 and +44 1223 511455 > > > > http://www.ninetiles.com > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > 5gangip mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/5gangip > > _______________________________________________ > 5gangip mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/5gangip > _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
