Folks - Here is the response in pending state. We are holding for WG
feedback. 

If you have any objections too this, please let us know by 13th of July,
2018.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1586/


Sri





On 7/6/18, 11:25 PM, "dmm on behalf of Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)"
<[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]>
wrote:

>Hi Arashmid,
>
>Thanks for the feedback.
>
>I have added a link to the DMM WG pages and it has links to all the DMM
>documents. I think that should be OK, we don’t have to explicitly list out
>every single I-D at this stage. As we move forward and based on WG
>discussions/progress, we can provide more detailed feedback on each
>document. I suggest we keep this simple for now.
>
>
>
>> So, what happens next? We wait for their reply?
>
>This is just a response to the LS; more an information exchange on the
>status/progress.
>
>
>
>Regards
>Sri
>
>
>
>
>On 7/6/18, 1:56 PM, "Arashmid Akhavain" <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>
>>Hi Sri,
>>
>>We might also want to add draft-camarillo-dmm-srv6-mobile-pocs-00
>>under "Related Documents".
>>
>>Also, we might want to say something like:
>>"Although we will NOT pick a particular approach,
>>we will be ready to provide further assistance to 3GPP regarding
>>the technical details of different candidates."
>>
>>So, what happens next? We wait for their reply?
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Arashmid
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: dmm [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sri Gundavelli
>>> (sgundave)
>>> Sent: 06 July 2018 13:49
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New Study Item on
>>> User Plane Protocol in 5GC"
>>> 
>>> We plan to send the following response to 3GPP CT4.  If you have any
>>>quick
>>> comments/corrections/suggestions, please let us know in a day.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ³
>>> Thank you for your Liaison request (Reference: CP-173160) and for
>>>sharing
>>> the information on the status of the CT4 study item on user-plane
>>>protocol
>>> for 5GC. The IETF DMM working group wants to acknowledge your request
>>> and want to share the following update.
>>> 
>>> IETF DMM working is currently reviewing various proposals on approaches
>>> for realizing optimizations in user-plane for mobile packet core. These
>>> proposals include protocol specifications based on new/existing
>>>protocols
>>> and proposals covering requirements/analysis/comparison of various
>>> approaches. At this point of time, some of these documents are working
>>> group documents and some are individual submissions and yet to be
>>> adopted as working group documents.  Based on the working group
>>>interest,
>>> feedback charter-scope, the working group may choose to adopt some of
>>> these work items as working group documents and at that time will seek
>>> feedback from 3GPP.
>>> 
>>> We also would like to state that the DMM working group will not be in a
>>> position to pick a single approach/solution as THE approach for
>>>user-plane
>>> optimization. Most likely the working group may standardize more than
>>>one
>>> approach, but will characterize each of these approaches based on its
>>> technical capabilities and limitations. This approach would be
>>>consistent with
>>> the approach that IETF took with IPv6 transitioning work, where IETF
>>> standardized multiple approaches including DSLite, NAT64, Gi-DSLite and
>>> other approaches.
>>> 
>>> Finally, IETF would like to point 3GPP to the following documents under
>>> consideration.
>>> 
>>> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-bogineni-dmm-optimized-mobile-user-plane-
>>> 01.tx
>>> t (Individual submission)
>>> 
>>> https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-
>>> 00.tx
>>> t (Individual submission)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Related Documents:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-02.txt
>>>(Working
>>> group document)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Link to DMM Pages:
>>> 
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/dmm/documents/
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Please let us know if you need any additional information.
>>> "
>>> 
>>> -----
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 4/11/18, 11:16 AM, "Liaison Statement Management Tool"
>>> <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> >Title: CP-173160: New Study Item on User Plane Protocol in 5GC
>>> >Submission Date: 2018-04-11 URL of the IETF Web page:
>>> >https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1572/
>>> >Please reply by 2018-07-20
>>> >From: Satoru Matsushima <[email protected]>
>>> >To: Sri Gundavelli <[email protected]>,Dapeng Liu
>>> ><[email protected]>
>>> >Cc: Dapeng Liu <[email protected]>,Terry Manderson
>>> ><[email protected]>,Distributed Mobility Management
>>> Discussion
>>> >List <[email protected]>,Sri Gundavelli <[email protected]>,Suresh
>>> Krishnan
>>> ><[email protected]> Response Contacts:
>>> >[email protected],[email protected]
>>> >Technical Contacts:
>>> >Purpose: For action
>>> >
>>> >Body: 1. Overall Description:
>>> >3GPP working group of CT4 (Core and Terminal) would like to inform the
>>> >IETF that CT4 has initiated a study item on user plane protocol in 5GC
>>> >for Release-16 of 5G phase 2 (see CP-173160).
>>> >
>>> >Based on the outcome from the IETF / 3GPP Coordination meeting at
>>> >IETF#100, 3GPP CT4 got aware that IETF DMM WG is currently working on
>>>a
>>> >possible candidate protocol for the 3GPP 5G user plane protocol.
>>> >
>>> >3GPP CT4 wants to emphasize that currently there is no related
>>> >evaluation ongoing in 3GPP. Nevertheless, a study item was approved
>>>for
>>> >such a study to start in the second half of 2018. The study will
>>> >evaluate between existing solutions within 3GPP and other protocols,
>>> >based on the Release
>>> >16 stage 2 (system architecture) requirements.
>>> >
>>> >3GPP CT4 would like to point IETF DMM to the following specifications
>>> >on GTP-U. The Release 16 stage 2 requirements are not yet known but it
>>> >is worth looking at latest GTP-U spec which will be evaluated through
>>> >the study as the existing protocol.
>>> >
>>> >€  [1] 3GPP TS 29.281 (V15.1.0): GPRS Tunnelling Protocol User Plane
>>> >(GTPv1-U)
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >Following technical report provides information of how 3GPP considered
>>> >GTP-U apply to user plane of 5G_ph1:
>>> >
>>> >€  [2] 3GPP TR 29.891 (V15.0.0): 5G System ­ Phase 1; CT4 Aspects
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >Furthermore, 3GPP would like to give the following general guidance to
>>> >IETF DMM, regarding user plane transport within 3GPP networks. These
>>> >are technical specifications that include also the necessary
>>> >information to understand which architectural, QoS, security-related
>>> >and high-level requirements GTP-U currently complies to within 5G_ph1.
>>> >
>>> >€  [3] 3GPP TS 23.501 (V15.0.0): System Architecture for the 5G System
>>> >€  [4] 3GPP TS 23.502 (V15.0.0): Procedures for the 5G System
>>> >€  [5] 3GPP TS 23.503 (V15.0.0): Policy and Charging Framework for the
>>> 5G
>>> >System
>>> >€  [6] 3GPP TS 33.501 (V0.6.0): Security Architecture (work in
>>>progress)
>>> >
>>> >2. Actions:
>>> >To IETF DMM:
>>> >ACTION:    CT4 respectfully asks IETF DMM to provide any information
>>> that
>>> >may be relevant to the above CT4 work by July 2018.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >3. Date of Next CT and CT4 Meetings:
>>> >CT4#83     26th Feb ­ 2nd Mar 2018 Montreal, CAN
>>> >CT#79      19th ­ 20th Mar 2018    Chennai, India
>>> >CT4#84     16th ­ 20th April 2018  Kunming, China
>>> >CT4#85     21st ­ 25th May 2018    Osaka, Japan
>>> >CT#80      11th ­ 12th June 2018   La Jolla, USA
>>> >CT4#85-bis   9th ­13th July 2018   TBD, France
>>> >CT4#86     20st ­ 24th Aug 2018    TBD, USA
>>> >Attachments:
>>> >
>>> >    CP-180116
>>> >
>>> 
>>>>https://www.ietf.org/lib/dt/documents/LIAISON/liaison-2018-04-11-3gpp-t
>>> >sgc
>>> 
>>>>t-ct4-dmm-cp-173160-new-study-item-on-user-plane-protocol-in-5gc-attach
>>> >men
>>> >t-1.doc
>>> >
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dmm mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>
>_______________________________________________
>dmm mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

Reply via email to