Hi John, Thanks a lot for your comments. We'll address in the new version after the WGLC.
Carlos On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 10:36 PM John Kaippallimalil < [email protected]> wrote: > I had agreed to review this draft at the last IETF in Bangkok – so here it > is. > > > > After reading the draft again, I think it is well written and ready to > move forward. > > > > A few minor comments for consideration: > > - 3.1.2, "the MN's chooses as source IP address of packets > belonging to an IP flow, an address allocated by the network the MN is > attached to when the flow was initiated" > > The sentence does not read well. The intention is probably that “the MN > chooses a source IP address for packets …..” or something similar? > > - 4.1., "Regardless of whether IP mobility is needed, if the > flow has terminated before the MN moves to a new network, the flow may > subsequently restart using the new IP address assigned from the new > network." > > Should the sentence be saying, "... if the flow has *not* terminated > ...." > > - 4.2., For references to [Paper-Distributed.Mobility], > [Paper-Distributed.Mobility.PMIP] and [Paper-Distributed.Mobility.Review]: > would it be possible to give a sentence on the key point of each. It would > be easier for reading. > > > > BR, > > John > > > > > > *From:* dmm [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Arashmid Akhavain > *Sent:* Wednesday, January 16, 2019 9:00 AM > *To:* Voyer, Daniel <[email protected]>; [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [DMM] Fwd: WGLC on > draft-ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring-11 > > > > Yes, +1, I support this draft > > > > Arashmid > > > > Begin forwarded message: > > > > From: *Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)* <[email protected]> > Date: Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 7:43 PM > Subject: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring-11 > To: [email protected] <[email protected]> > > > > > Folks – As we discussed in the WG meeting at IETF103, we are issuing WGLC > on draft-ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring-11. > > > > The document went through several revisions and there were good amount of > reviews on this document. The authors have addressed all the comments and > there are no open issues that we are tracking at this time. We believe the > document is ready for IESG reviews and like to confirm the same from the > working group. > > > > > > The following message commences a two week WGLC for all feedback. > > > > Document Link: > > > https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring-11.txt > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fid%2Fdraft-ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring-11.txt&data=02%7C01%7CAkbar.Rahman%40InterDigital.com%7C259985cba37b4299215c08d67adaa9ae%7Ce351b779f6d54e50856880e922d180ae%7C0%7C0%7C636831476918598320&sdata=9J31DyPXczsZw4wWHmFYRM3QPTeYb8oMNgs1%2BAxNhhY%3D&reserved=0> > > > > The target status for this document is “Informational”. > > > > Please post any comments/concerns on the draft. > > > > Thanks! > > Dapeng & Sri > > > > _______________________________________________ > dmm mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fdmm&data=02%7C01%7CAkbar.Rahman%40InterDigital.com%7C259985cba37b4299215c08d67adaa9ae%7Ce351b779f6d54e50856880e922d180ae%7C0%7C0%7C636831476918598320&sdata=%2B80oX%2BmJrwSPC2%2BhiYzHM9dIBBW3OhjlfPj%2FUU7pLHI%3D&reserved=0> > > > > _______________________________________________ > dmm mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm > > _______________________________________________ > dmm mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm >
_______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
