Hello folks,
During the [dmm] meeting at IETF 104, I suggested that we should try
breaking the YANG definitions out into a different document so that
potential reviewers would not be intimidated by 150+ pages of document
text. I got reasonable support for at least trying the idea. If it
doesn't work, I will volunteer to recombine them in the future.
Briefly scanning the base document, I see that it needs another pass for
readability as well. That will take a while, so I propose to do that
later after the submission of the two companion documents. I will scan
both documents for consistency and so on, but they are ready for
submission now. In the YANG document, I was considering to include a
list (without definitions) in the Terminology section for the FPC terms
that are defined in the base document. Comments are welcome about that
suggestion.
Suresh has expressed the opinion that it would be O.K. to have the
companion YANG document considered to be a WG document. If anyone in
the [dmm] group has objections to this proposal, please let me know.
Thanks in advance!
Regards,
Charlie P.
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
