Hi Ines, Thanks for the review. We'll check with IANA folks about how to add more details (whether they do it or we do).
Thanks, Carlos On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 10:21 PM Ines Robles via Datatracker < [email protected]> wrote: > Reviewer: Ines Robles > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-04 > Reviewer: Ines Robles > Review Date: 2019-10-14 > IETF LC End Date: 2019-10-14 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: > > I believe the draft is technically good. This document is well written. > > The document proposes Distributed Mobility Management for Proxy Mobile > IPv6 in > which mobility sessions are anchored at the last IP hop router called MAAR > (mobility anchor and access router). The document focuses on the required > extensions to effectively support simultaneously anchoring several flows at > different distributed gateways. > > I have a minor concern detailed in Nits section. > > Major issues:Not Issues found > > Minor issues: Not Issues found > > Nits/editorial comments: > > It would be nice to specify IANA Section with more details, such as > indicating > the registry which the option type belong, etc. [rfc8126] > > Thank you for this document, > > Ines. > > > -- Special Issue "Beyond 5G Evolution": https://www.mdpi.com/journal/electronics/special_issues/beyond_5g
_______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
