Hi Carlos, THanks for addressing my comments. I don't have any further issues with the document.
Cheers, Joe On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 5:06 AM CARLOS JESUS BERNARDOS CANO <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear Joseph, > > We've just posted a new revision (-14) addressing all your comments. > > Thanks! > > Carlos > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 1:12 PM CARLOS JESUS BERNARDOS CANO < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Dear Joseph, >> >> Thanks a lot for the review. We will improve the security consideration >> section by including also some of the considerations mentioned in draft- >> ietf-dmm-deployment-models-04, and also by better scoping current text. >> We believe we don't need much more in terms of text, as the document is >> informational, and the actual security mechanisms for a distributed >> anchoring solution would depend on the specifics of that solution. We can >> also better reflect that rational in the text. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Carlos >> >> On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 12:25 AM Joseph Salowey via Datatracker < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Reviewer: Joseph Salowey >>> Review result: Has Issues >>> >>> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's >>> ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the >>> IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the >>> security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat >>> these comments just like any other last call comments. >>> >>> The summary of the review is the document has issues with the security >>> considerations section. >>> >>> The security consideration section is extremely light. It mainly >>> contains text >>> from RFC 7333. It seems that there should be more discussion of >>> security as it >>> relates to the different configurations and different cases. Do each >>> of these >>> cases have the same security properties and require the same types of >>> security >>> controls? >>> >>> Are the IPSEC recommendations mentioned in the security considerations of >>> draft-ietf-dmm-deployment-models-04 applicable for all the cases? >>> Should >>> these be pointed out in the security considerations section? >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Special Issue "Beyond 5G Evolution": >> https://www.mdpi.com/journal/electronics/special_issues/beyond_5g >> >> > > -- > Special Issue "Beyond 5G Evolution": > https://www.mdpi.com/journal/electronics/special_issues/beyond_5g > >
_______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
