On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 4:20 PM CARLOS JESUS BERNARDOS CANO <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Warren, > > Thanks for your comments. I've checked my e-mail twice and I haven't been > able to see the review from Qin Wu. Can you please forward it to me. > According to my records I've replied to all the comments and reviews to this > draft (I'm working on another one that is also at the IESG evaluation now -- > draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif -- but this a different document). >
All directorate reviews should be linked from the Datatracker page: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring/ The direct link to Qin's is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring-13-opsdir-lc-wu-2019-10-02/ > Apologies in advance if I've missed the review from Qin Wu. > Ah, fair enough, it is easy to miss emails, sometimes they go into spam, etc. W > Thanks, > > Carlos > > On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 7:57 PM Warren Kumari via Datatracker > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for >> draft-ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring-14: No Objection >> >> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all >> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this >> introductory paragraph, however.) >> >> >> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html >> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. >> >> >> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring/ >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> COMMENT: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> I am balloting NoObj, but I had a hard time deciding between this and DISCUSS >> (I went with NoObj because I'm submitting this late) - Qin Wu submitted an >> OpsDir review with a number of open questions, as well as some very easy to >> address comments / suggestions. It looks like this were either ignored, or >> missed (or, perhaps I missed the discussion) >> >> I strongly encourage the authors and AD to review and address these comments. >> >> >> -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
