Hi Adam, Thanks a lot for your review. Please see inline below for my comments.
On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 6:20 AM Adam Roach via Datatracker <[email protected]> wrote: > Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-05: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thanks for the work on this document. I have only one editorial suggestion. > > Section 3.6: > > > to-point link) with MN1, exposing itself as a (logical) router with a > > specific MAC (e.g., 00:11:22:33:01:01) and IPv6 addresses (e.g., > > Please use a MAC address from the range reserved for documentation > purposes by > section 2.1.1 of RFC 7042. > [CB] Thanks. Addressing a comment from Éric I've ended up removing the MAC address in the text, so this is not necessary, though I'll keep it in mind in case we need to mention a MAC address. Thanks, Carlos
_______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
