Hi all,

Due to a presentation order change and time shortage, we were not able to present the 5g-uplane-analysis draft yesterday. The presentation materials are uploaded below, so if you are interested in them, please check them out.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/109/materials/slides-109-dmm-user-plane-protocol-and-architectural-analysis-on-3gpp-5g-system-01

Also, as you can see in the email from Shunsuke, we're looking for feedback on the future direction of this draft, so please let us know if you have any ideas.

Regards,
Takuya

On 2020/11/17 9:41, Shunsuke Homma wrote:
Hi Hannu,

Thank you for informing the status of 3GPP.

Unfortunately, we did not have enough time to restructure the whole of document at this update. We’ll modify introduction, conclusion and any other sections at next updating with referring the result of 3GPP.

Meanwhile, we’d like to make this document be valuable for future IETF work relevant to 3GPP, and need feedback and opinion how to forward this work from WG.

Best regards,

Shunsuke behalf of authors


2020年11月16日(月) 4:33 Flinck, Hannu (Nokia - FI/Espoo) <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>:

    Hello authors of the draft-ietf-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-04.txt draft,

    As I have said earlier 3GPP CT4 as concluded the user plane study
    that the draft is indirectly referring through the liaison
    statements in the intro section.
    The study listed a number of issues why Srv6 is not considered
    suitable for the user plane. Please review 3GPP TR 29.892 and take
    that into account in the analysis.

    I also would like to note that the Rel 16 is completed and 3GPP is
    working on Rel 17.

    Therefore the sentences like " The study description mentions that
    the study would be based on
       Release 16 requirement while only Release 15 specifications has
    been
       available now.  However we believe that to provide adequate
       information for 3GPP, we need to clearly understand what the
    current
       user plane protocol is in Release 15, and architectural
    requirements
       for the user plane." is very weird considering that you are
    addressing completed Release.

    I cannot understand why and what is the benefit of such.

    Best regards
    Hannu

    -----Original Message-----
    From: dmm <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> On
    Behalf Of [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    Sent: Monday, November 2, 2020 5:31 PM
    To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    Cc: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    Subject: [DMM] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-04.txt


    A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
    directories.
    This draft is a work item of the Distributed Mobility Management
    WG of the IETF.

            Title           : User Plane Protocol and Architectural
    Analysis on 3GPP 5G System
            Authors         : Shunsuke Homma
                              Takuya Miyasaka
                              Satoru Matsushima
                              Daniel Voyer
            Filename        : draft-ietf-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-04.txt
            Pages           : 42
            Date            : 2020-11-02

    Abstract:
       This document analyzes the mobile user plane protocol and the
       architecture specified in 3GPP 5G documents.  The analysis work
    is to
       clarify those specifications, extract protocol and architectural
       requirements and derive evaluation aspects for user plane protocols
       on IETF side.  This work is corresponding to the User Plane
    Protocol
       Study work on 3GPP side.


    The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis/
    <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis/>

    There are also htmlized versions available at:
    https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-04
    <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-04>
    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-04
    <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-04>

    A diff from the previous version is available at:
    https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-04
    <https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-04>


    Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
    submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at
    tools.ietf.org <http://tools.ietf.org>.

    Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
    ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
    <ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/>


    _______________________________________________
    dmm mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
    <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>

    _______________________________________________
    dmm mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
    <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>


_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

Reply via email to