Hmmm.
It seems to me that this document ought to align with the ongoing work
in the TEAS working group that is attempting to define terminology and
framework (and then any necessary protocol mechanisms) for IETF network
slices. That work is explicitly intended to support 3GPP end-to-end
network slices.
First, the discussion there exlicitly conluded that the term "Transport"
was confusing and misleading. Which is why the work is now called IETF
network slicing.
Second, it seems that we want one IETF framework for this, not two
competing frameworks. Why is DMM doing this separately. It seems to
fall squarely into CCAMP and TEAS. I presume we want a solution that
works for 3GPP and works for other use cases?
Yours,
Joel M. Halpern
On 1/4/2021 7:11 PM, Linda Dunbar wrote:
Support WG adoption.
Linda Dunbar
-------------------
From: *Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)* <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 10:45 AM
Subject: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08
as a WG document
To: dmm <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
Folks:
The authors of the document, Transport Network aware Mobility for 5G,
have presented the proposal and the need for standardization in multiple
IETF WG meetings. There have been good amount of discussions in the
mailers and there is some level of interest for the work from the
community. We are therefore considering the adoption of this document as
a DMM WG document, to be moved on Informational Standards track.
*Transport Network aware Mobility for 5G*
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08
<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftools.ietf.org%2Fhtml%2Fdraft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08&data=04%7C01%7Clinda.dunbar%40futurewei.com%7C6af4a1ce1b62454eb25d08d8b0350e40%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637453089238313897%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=SsBq92wzWCggc5r7r96NPHV2cAan2tjtvoYF2LEBtqY%3D&reserved=0>
With this background, we would like to ask the WG to provide some
feedback on their interest for this work. Please provide substantial
comments as why this SHOULD be adopted, or why it SHOULD NOT be adopted.
If there is interest, and if there are no other concerns from
AD/IESG/Others, then we may take up this work.
The adoption call will end on 18th of January, 2021.
Regards
DMM WG Chairs
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fdmm&data=04%7C01%7Clinda.dunbar%40futurewei.com%7C6af4a1ce1b62454eb25d08d8b0350e40%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637453089238323895%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=3CAVTNOGuuKjj0rAJcv54OPPObzMj6YSnPf2tsfKYG4%3D&reserved=0>
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
