As I believe I said earlier, I consider this work to be inappropriate
for the IETF and the working group.
Developing SRv6 is an IETF activity. We have done and are doing that.
Developing any needed extensions to address 3GPP requirements should be
done in conjunction with 3GPP based on their requirements. 3GPP has not
expressed any such requirements.
When other standards bodies have redefined the architecture of our
protocols, we (the IETF) have objected. And for good reasons.
Therefore, we owe other standards bodies the same respect. We should
not produce standards (this is a standards track document) that modify
other bodies architectures.
Yours,
Joel
On 4/7/2021 1:35 PM, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) wrote:
Working Group:
As we discussed in the last IETF meeting, we are issuingWGLCon
draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-11.
The document went through several revisions and there were good amount
of reviews on this document. I am very pleased with the quality of this
document. The authors have addressed all the comments and there are no
open issues that we are tracking at this time. We believe the document
is ready for IESG reviews and like to confirm the same from the working
group.
The following message commences a two weekWGLCfor all feedback.
Document Link:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-11.txt
<https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-11.txt>
Please post any comments/concerns on this document.
Thanks!
Sri
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
