> > ** I also don’t understand the 3GPP coordination described in the shepherd > report resulting in this document being moved from PS to Informational > status. > Is this new behavior requested by 3GPP? >
Roman, I tried to give a heads up <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iesg/LNZKzM6nRDJOuXu6iRksJ7ExMms/> earlier, and also mention it at [a bit] more length in the ballot write up <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane/writeup/>: the change to Informational track was requested by 3GPP liaison (and others).
_______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
